Buy at Amazon

Tuesday, November 20, 2007

National Review Editors Not Buying what Huck's Selling

In an editorial titled "Right Questions; Wrong Answers" the National Review has crossed Mike Huckabee off their list.
What Republicans need is a new domestic policy to address today’s concerns.

Unfortunately, what Huckabee offers by way of solutions is a mixture of populism and big-government liberalism; the common theme of his policies is that they are half-baked. If an ill-considered slogan can be used to justify a policy, he is for it. He is a protectionist, because we need to have “fair trade.” He wants to put illegal immigrants on a path to citizenship, because we need them “to do jobs that are going unfilled because nobody here wants to do them.” Energy subsidies and farm subsidies must be increased, because they’re a matter of “national security.”

When he was governor of Arkansas, these instincts led Huckabee to move farther and farther in a statist direction. (Education policy offers a nice example of what happens when his statism and his social conservatism conflict: He opposes meaningful school choice.) The Cato Institute gave him a D on fiscal policy, noting that spending had increased at three times the rate of inflation during his governorship. Not surprisingly, Huckabee is the one Republican candidate who flinched when President Bush vetoed the Democrats’ proposed expansion of S-CHIP. He says he is against socialized medicine, but don’t look for him to resist the drift toward it.

On domestic issues Huckabee makes one major departure from welfare-state liberalism, and it is a doozy. He says he is “running to completely eliminate all federal income and payroll taxes,” by implementing a national sales tax: “When the FairTax becomes law, it will be like waving a magic wand releasing us from pain and unfairness.” This proposal would almost certainly make a presidential nominee unelectable. But even if he got elected, it would be impossible to deliver. To bar the door on the income tax we would need to amend the Constitution. Otherwise we would end up with the income tax and Huckabee’s sales tax. We would call it a pipe dream, if Huckabee weren’t so anti-smoking.

Several of the Republican presidential candidates share Huckabee’s views on abortion and same-sex marriage. On domestic-policy issues, however, he stands alone. Thankfully.
"Ouch, Ouch, and OUCH" I hear the Huckabee camp's cries as they take those body blows.

The people of Iowa need to be educated about that Fair Tax argument . . . and the inherent hypocrisy that Huck has signed on to the "No New Taxes" pledge . . . but is promising to break it if he can with this Fair Tax. I think Mikey has some "splanin" to do, eh?

2 comments:

Nealie Ride said...

Ian,

Your post is too long, too boring, and likely too inaccurate to read.

I'll keep my comments short. Huck can't win. Good luck with future writing.

http://nyformitt.blogspot.com/

Anonymous said...

The key, nealie,

...is to read my post before you've had the turkey. That ole tryptophan in the turkey meat will make you sleepy.

Wake up! It's time for you to keep the fruits of your labor, and pay taxes in the process of meeting your, and your family's, needs.

After you study the clicks in my previous post, hopefullly you'll see things a bit more clearly. With Romney, Giuliani, and Thompson - it's theIRS on your back.

Now, enjoy the bird, and your family, on this Thanksgiving Day.