Buy at Amazon

Wednesday, January 30, 2008

The Republican Dream Team Strategy

UPDATE: Okay Huckster supporters reading this blog. I said some unflattering words about Huckster down this post and things have gotten a little hot in the comments section. I've got some strong opinions against Mike Huckabee. I don't like him and I really feel that he ran a horribly divisive campaign in Iowa, used below the belt, knife in the back attacks etc... Here's what I'm getting at. I think Mitt supporters should still support Mitt until the convention, but lets be open to the possibility that McCain could unite the Republicans. With the right words, and statesman like behavior/attitude, McCain could smooth over the differences between the varying camps. (Romney could do the same thing if he gets the nomination. That's my opinion)

UPDATE 2: I watched the debate last night, and... So far it isn't looking like a dream team is coming together. I am just crossing my fingers at this point.

I was really really hoping that Mitt Romney would win last night.


I wanted to see Mitt gain a head of steam and take it all the way to victory.

Mitt is still my candidate. I'll support him until the convention. But I do want to put some of my current thoughts out there about McCain.

First - I supported McCain in 2000. I like McCain. I may disagree with him sometimes, but I'll take McCain any day. It's easy to get caught up in a primary election and be overzealous toward your candidates' opponents. If Rudy, or Fred had ran away with the nomination I would not have been upset and would gladly have voted for them. It looks to me like John McCain has the most reasonable trajectory toward the nomination at this moment and I'm not freaking out about it.

I support Mitt still because I think he's better than McCain, Rudy, Fred, and the rest of the crowd. But it was never a question for me of whether or not I would vote for these guys. If Rudy had gotten the nomination, I wouldn't be one of those voters pushing for a 3rd party candiate. I voted for George W. Bush in 2000, and 2004 specifically because I trust him to pick supreme court justices more than I trusted Al Gore, or John Kerry. I trust GWB with my tax dollars more than I trust them with John Kerry. My opinion: Mitt Romney is the best choice for America. But the other guys would have been okay too.

Let's assume McCain gets the nomination and Mitt tapers off in the next few weeks.
  1. McCain still will have trouble competing financially with Billary Clobama in the general election. Remember both of those candidates have raised over 100 million dollars each.
  2. McCain still needs to reach out to all aspects of the republican coalition.
  3. McCain needs a competent VP pick who has the energy and capacity and competence to take over if McCain keels over and dies in office.
  4. McCain needs an organization with infrastructure that can counter the Clinton Machine.
  5. McCain needs a narrative that can unite the Republicans, and compete with the Democratic narrative that has been shaping up within the mainstream media.
  6. McCain needs to realize that the media support he has enjoyed up to this point will end the moment he receives the nomination, if that happens.

McCain needs to put together a 'Dream Team'

If McCain gets the nod, Romney should be the VP.

  1. He's got the infrastructure
  2. He's got the fundraising capacity
  3. He's got the rhetorical skills to counter the Bill Clintons, and the Barack Obamas.
  4. He's got the executive skills, to be President, but he's also got the consultant skills that can be unleashed behind the scenes to re-reinvent government.
  5. Any point Clinton or Obama could make in a debate in a general election, with Mitt as VP could be countered with... 'Healthcare? My VP has more healthcare experience than all of us in this room put together. We have a team. We're not going to change this country alone, we're going to unite and solve our problems as one America.' 'Budget balancing? We've got more fiscal hawk experience on my team than all the democrats put together.' Etc...

What about the other candidates?

  • Rudy - Has shown class in the way he has run his campaign. His personal life may not be totally perfect, but he should rightly be proud of what he accomplished in NYC. His talents should be brought to bear in a 2008-2012 republican administration. Rudy should be the Secretary of State.
  • Fred Thompson - He should be on the ticket somewhere, but I'm not sure where.
  • Huckster - he needs to be put to use somehow. He has shown an uncanny ability to turn out small town, squirrel eating, narrow minded, uneducated voters in droves. We're going to need all the votes we can get in the general election. Huckster and Romney have reason not to like each other, and in my opinion it has everything to do with Huckster playing the religion card during the primaries, and the fact that Huckster is a big idiot. McCain could very well be the best person to convince Romney and Huckster, and their supporters (like me) to bury the hatchet. Also Romney could easily hook Huckster up with some legitimate way to pay his mortgage without accepting bribes.

With a dream team put together, the republicans can counter the democrats. What I don't want to see is personal vendettas that tear apart the republican party. I've read several places that McCain 'hates' Mitt Romney. I don't want the democrats picking our judges for the next decade. I don't want the democrats dealing with health care, or social security or anything else. PLEASE? Can't we all just get along?

Mitt. In my opinion, you should just run your organization for the next 14 days. Get all the delegates you can. Don't blow a lot of money on advertising. Everybody knows you've got plenty. You're the obvious choice for President. You're also the obvious VP pick. You and McCain could unite the party.

Mitt, you've had my vote this whole time. You're my guy. Play this right please?

McCain. You and I are cool with each other. Please play this right? Please do this in such a way that if you get the nomination you can unite the repubicans.



Coach said...

I love your characterization of Huckabee followers. Too funny.

On the other hand, I supported McCain in 2000 too, but I won't support him again. Closely watching him has made his faults too apparent to ignore. I suppose campaigning brings out the worst in people, but I find that everything uninformed people hold against Romney, I hold against McCain because I AM informed: I don't trust him and I don't like his character. Add to this my growing suspicions that he is trigger happy and interested more in conquest than peace (euphemistic for "war monger"), and I'm not going to vote for him, even if it means voting for the dem.

HawkeyeState said...

Mitt needs to stop McLiberal on Super Tuesday.

Anonymous said...

Wow, you know calling Huckabee supporters "small town,squirrel eating, narrow minded, uneducated voters" is REALLY an effective way to get them to respect and admire Romney. What a great way to get others to come to Mitt's side. This is attitude is a reflection of why so many of Huckabee supporters are hesitant to support Romney. Seriously, come on! How arrogant to state that Huckabee's supporters must be as stupid as dirt. I respect your opinion and have been impressed with the work you do on this blog for your candidate but this post is below the belt. I'm sorry that it has come to this in today's political arena.

From, one of those "small town, squirrel eating, narrow minded, uneducated voter" who happens to be working on a PhD and carefully researched all the candidates before choosing Huckabee.

MaverickMan said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Joe Mama said...


Look at the map. Huck won Iowa because of two demographics.

Women in towns with a population of 10k or less.

People with a household income of less than 30k.

He won in Iowa because he turned out voters among those two demographics in huge numbers. All the rest of the demographics went Romney's way. Those are the two demographics where voters would be persuaded by Huck's destructive logic in using religion as a wedge issue. I was right here in Iowa, and everybody knew what Huck was doing.

If he had different demographics supporting him he would have seen a much bigger fundraising bounce after Iowa.

Do some intelligent voters look at the issues and decide on Huck? Yes of course. Are ALL Huckabee supporters squirrel eaters? No.

Want to know how Huck does among republicans in general? Look at the other state contests.

Let's be clear on how Huck won Iowa. He turned out unexpectedly HUGE amounts of people in small towns, and more voters than normal among the less than 30k household income demographic.

Hey, its an asset in a general election to be able to turn out voters like that. Maybe you're working on a PhD, but don't try to extrapolate that out to most other Huck voters.

It's also an asset to have 200 million dollars of your own money to spend.

It's also an asset to have a fundraising network that outclasses all your opponents.

It's also an asset to have taken away healthcare as the democrats' signature campaign issue.

It's also an asset to have turned around every major organization you've ever run.

Huck has none of these advantages. In a general he wouldn't even be able to say 'I'll deliver you the south.' McCain doesn't need that. The south will already vote for McCain over any democrat. Huck's asset is this: He can turn out specific demographics of voters.

Big Jay said...

Maverickman -

I deleted your comment because it recycles old worn out discredited arguments about my guy Mitt. I'm not going to suffer fools any longer, at least on my posts.

Big Jay

Anonymous said...

Joe Mama--

I'm sorry, but I think you basically implied in your comment that those who are from small towns and make less than 30K a year are automatically idiots who will believe anything.

You live in a sad, strange reality.

That was one of the most bigoted comments I've heard in a long time.

Joe Mama said...


Nice try.

Exhibit A - Huckabee's antics in Iowa

Exhibit B - Huckabee's votes in Iowa

Have you noticed the major policy turnarounds that guy has made in the last 30 days? I have employees who have less than 30k household incomes. That's between everybody in the household it comes out to less than 30k. That means one thing. It means no college degree. That's not bigoted. That's a perfectly rational explanation of what happened. Nobody else was fooled by Huckabee with those numbers.

The democrats would have eaten him for lunch.